Episode 10

The Learning with Accessibility Never Ends

Ross Mullen, CANAXESS, Director

Ross Mullen talks about his extensive experience in working with standards organizations for accessibility. He spent many years working with accessibility for government agencies. Now, Ross has his own consulting practice.

Mentioned in this episode:

Info about Accessibility at Blink

Transcript
Speaker:

(upbeat music)

Speaker:

- Hello, this is Digital Accessibility,

Speaker:

the people behind the progress.

Speaker:

I'm Joe Welinsky, the creator and host of this series,

Speaker:

and as an accessibility professional myself,

Speaker:

I find it very interesting

Speaker:

as to how others have found their way

Speaker:

into this profession,

Speaker:

so, let's meet one of those people right now

Speaker:

and hear about their journey.

Speaker:

(upbeat music)

Speaker:

- All right, well, here we go

Speaker:

with another episode where I have the opportunity

Speaker:

to speak with another accessibility practitioner.

Speaker:

Today, I'm speaking with Ross Mullen.

Speaker:

Hello, Ross, how are you doing today?

Speaker:

- Hi there, how are you going, Joe?

Speaker:

How's things?

Speaker:

- Everything's going really well.

Speaker:

I am located right now in my home office

Speaker:

on Vashon Island, which is a true island

Speaker:

with no bridges

Speaker:

near Blink's Seattle, Washington headquarters.

Speaker:

Where are you talking to us from today?

Speaker:

- I'm from Canberra, Australia,

Speaker:

so, if one's unfamiliar,

Speaker:

it's about 320 kilometers of southwest of the Sydney,

Speaker:

slipped back in the middle of nowhere,

Speaker:

so, Fremont just surrounded by bush.

Speaker:

So, we have no beach, no sea,

Speaker:

but we have a lot of beautiful countryside around here.

Speaker:

- And I have been there.

Speaker:

I went to a conference there one time

Speaker:

and got to see the interesting architecture

Speaker:

that was developed.

Speaker:

I believe your city was a design capital city for Australia.

Speaker:

Isn't that or originally how it was set up?

Speaker:

- It was, yes.

Speaker:

Yeah, and one of your fellow residents won the competition,

Speaker:

Walter Burley Griffin,

Speaker:

so, I believe, if my memory serves me correctly,

Speaker:

it was the early 20th century.

Speaker:

There was a competition

Speaker:

for designing the federal capital here.

Speaker:

A camera was chosen, and the Griffins designed it all

Speaker:

without ever having visited here,

Speaker:

so, our largest lake

Speaker:

is Lake Burley Griffin, named after Walter,

Speaker:

so, there's a lot of interesting background history

Speaker:

of how this American Couple laid the foundations

Speaker:

for what is Canberra now.

Speaker:

- Well, it's good to have you join here.

Speaker:

I appreciate it.

Speaker:

We were able to get the time zones to work out,

Speaker:

but a good place to start

Speaker:

is talk a little bit about yourself

Speaker:

in the work that you're doing right now,

Speaker:

and then we can explore how you got there.

Speaker:

- Lovely, well, I work

Speaker:

under my company name at the moment, CANAXESS.

Speaker:

We've been working in web accessibility now

Speaker:

for about 12 years plus.

Speaker:

At the moment, I'm working

Speaker:

with a large Australian supermarket,

Speaker:

helping them meet accessibility guidelines

Speaker:

increasing the user experience.

Speaker:

Before that, I was working in a government,

Speaker:

so, previously my role was

Speaker:

that I'm a background developer, a backend.

Speaker:

I moved into front end,

Speaker:

and then, over time,

Speaker:

I moved into a dedicated web accessibility roles,

Speaker:

so, originally my background

Speaker:

was very much focused on compliance,

Speaker:

but more, and more, and more I was reading more

Speaker:

into work accessibility and understanding the nuances more,

Speaker:

so more and more now I find

Speaker:

when I have any questions related

Speaker:

to web accessibility, it's more that it depends,

Speaker:

it's that it's recognizing more

Speaker:

of the nuances in accessibility,

Speaker:

so, that's where I am the moment.

Speaker:

We're working with a large supermarket

Speaker:

and they've done ever so well meeting all

Speaker:

of their accessibility obligations,

Speaker:

but they're at a point now

Speaker:

of wanting to radically improve the use experience,

Speaker:

so, once you've met all

Speaker:

your minimum accessibility guidelines

Speaker:

and compliance aspects,

Speaker:

then it's recognizing that we can do much, much more,

Speaker:

and that's what's really interesting me at the moment,

Speaker:

the sort of, "What next in accessibility?"

Speaker:

- Well, as we were talking a little bit

Speaker:

before we started the recording.

Speaker:

We were talking a little bit about the differences

Speaker:

between the importance of compliance

Speaker:

for companies getting involved

Speaker:

in accessibility versus return on investment,

Speaker:

versus it being a socially progressive thing to do,

Speaker:

and so, you had some thoughts about

Speaker:

how things were in Australia.

Speaker:

I think that would be of interest

Speaker:

to people that aren't in it, that area,

Speaker:

in terms of how importance the compliance aspect

Speaker:

is for companies coming to you to work on things

Speaker:

versus other reasons

Speaker:

that they might wanna get involved with it.

Speaker:

- Very much so, yeah.

Speaker:

One of my early roles was within the government,

Speaker:

and even 15 years ago, there was this recognition

Speaker:

that due to the disability laws here,

Speaker:

we would need to make all

Speaker:

of our government digital services accessible,

Speaker:

so, it was very much focused on compliance,

Speaker:

but then, also, there were pockets of innovation,

Speaker:

individual for teams,

Speaker:

so, this is our minimum, but let's do more than that,

Speaker:

and for several years that was how it was moving

Speaker:

along pockets of individual expertise,

Speaker:

driving accessibility, but not necessarily making

Speaker:

a massive impact, but doing enough

Speaker:

to try and make a government to digital services accessible,

Speaker:

and then, with the work with the UK government,

Speaker:

a similar agency over here

Speaker:

was created, the Digital Transformation Agency,

Speaker:

and so, they brought over a lot of their expertise

Speaker:

with what they had accomplished in the UK government.

Speaker:

One of the things was introducing

Speaker:

a digital service standard.

Speaker:

This was basically a guideline

Speaker:

or a blueprint of how to make the government,

Speaker:

the services which served the needs of the user,

Speaker:

so, moving away from that compliance aspect

Speaker:

into making it truly user-centric,

Speaker:

so, this document had several criteria

Speaker:

for how to improve a government online,

Speaker:

the online services.

Speaker:

One of those points was accessibility.

Speaker:

It was this, individual items are called out,

Speaker:

and that was really, I guess,

Speaker:

the catalyst within a government,

Speaker:

which moved us from only doing a bare minimum

Speaker:

to recognizing what can we do better,

Speaker:

and that's when we could really see those innovations

Speaker:

in accessibility more, and more, and more,

Speaker:

and then, based on the back of that work,

Speaker:

there was the creation of the design system,

Speaker:

which had a lot of those accessibility principles baked in,

Speaker:

and so, the bold aim with this, the design system,

Speaker:

was there any federal and state or government agency

Speaker:

could deploy a website quickly

Speaker:

which had all of those core fundamentals,

Speaker:

so, all of those, accessibility,

Speaker:

the principles baked in,

Speaker:

and then under re-pinning that,

Speaker:

it was this documentation

Speaker:

of how to do more, and more, and more,

Speaker:

so that's been one of the main motivators

Speaker:

in the government space in recent years.

Speaker:

The digital transformation agencies bold aims of doing more

Speaker:

where, rather than just making up

Speaker:

a digital digital service

Speaker:

and having users fit in to working with it,

Speaker:

was recognizing what can we do better?

Speaker:

And that's where we really saw renovations in accessibility,

Speaker:

so bigger and better things

Speaker:

where one of the main things was that consistency,

Speaker:

so, if you had a design system

Speaker:

whilst government websites using it would work consistently.

Speaker:

It was baking in a lot of that accessibility,

Speaker:

so, before that, it was very much accessibility

Speaker:

was open to a different levels of interpretation,

Speaker:

so, one team in one department might think you

Speaker:

would achieve accessibility in this way.

Speaker:

Another team would say, "No, this is the right way,"

Speaker:

so, with the DTA's approach,

Speaker:

it was focusing all of our collective accessibility efforts

Speaker:

into, what's the best way?

Speaker:

Let's do things one way and the right way,

Speaker:

and it's been very, very well adopted,

Speaker:

but as I'm sure you experience a government's change,

Speaker:

and so, over time that a passion

Speaker:

for accessibility is often there,

Speaker:

but it's a bit more fragmented,

Speaker:

and that's what we are noticing again,

Speaker:

so, as governments change, as elections happen,

Speaker:

the focus of where and how digital services ought

Speaker:

to be made is wandering a bit at times,

Speaker:

so, from my experience,

Speaker:

there's always better ways to do things

Speaker:

and there's, lots of individuals within a government

Speaker:

are contributing to improving accessibility,

Speaker:

but from where it was five years ago to now,

Speaker:

we are noticing it drop off again.

Speaker:

- Well, let's find a little bit more out

Speaker:

about your background.

Speaker:

Most of us come into accessibility

Speaker:

in a lot of different ways, a lot of different paths

Speaker:

of both our lived life and opportunities

Speaker:

in our work life,

Speaker:

and where did it start for you

Speaker:

where accessibility was something

Speaker:

that you recognized as important and valuable,

Speaker:

and then, how did you decide

Speaker:

that would also be something you'd wanna do

Speaker:

or become involved in as a profession?

Speaker:

- Yeah, my background in accessibility began

Speaker:

where I had recently joined a new team within government,

Speaker:

so my background is that of a backend developer,

Speaker:

so, writing .NET and C#.

Speaker:

One of the expectations of this new team

Speaker:

was that they were making

Speaker:

a brand new digital service,

Speaker:

and as part of that,

Speaker:

it needed to be accessible.

Speaker:

As I joined the team,

Speaker:

I recognized no one really wanted to read through a WCAG.

Speaker:

At most, optimistic, it's a very dry document

Speaker:

with lots of contradictory information,

Speaker:

so, I found, well, as I'm new,

Speaker:

I would read it, and I would extract out

Speaker:

things which we as a team would need to do,

Speaker:

and so, either many, many months of reading it

Speaker:

and familiarizing myself with it more, and more, and more,

Speaker:

I recognized I was enjoying it

Speaker:

where I could understand that my work

Speaker:

as a backend developer could really,

Speaker:

significantly improve the end user's experience

Speaker:

if we understood accessibility more,

Speaker:

and I was pulling out

Speaker:

those themes, things which made sense,

Speaker:

and more, and more, and more,

Speaker:

I was becoming more familiar,

Speaker:

and as is always the case,

Speaker:

anyone who is showing a depthness,

Speaker:

understanding everything is someone labeled the expert.

Speaker:

Well, I never viewed myself as that.

Speaker:

I was just reading more, and more, and more,

Speaker:

and then understanding it more,

Speaker:

and then through my initial work,

Speaker:

in my initial work in accessibility,

Speaker:

I recognized I was liking it more.

Speaker:

I could understand it more,

Speaker:

I could drill down deeper and further,

Speaker:

so, as my background of a software engineer,

Speaker:

I was always wanting to really understand concepts more

Speaker:

than just the superficial level,

Speaker:

and I found with accessibility,

Speaker:

it was something which was hooking me more and more,

Speaker:

so that I moved to other teams

Speaker:

where, ultimately, I moved

Speaker:

into a dedicated web accessibility role.

Speaker:

Our regular work was auditing government applications

Speaker:

and working closely with a colleague.

Speaker:

We were a very good combination of moving past

Speaker:

that level of compliance,

Speaker:

things which are the minimum level

Speaker:

to making recommendations

Speaker:

of how to radically improve

Speaker:

a user's experience regardless of their disabilities,

Speaker:

and then I found working in accessibility,

Speaker:

I would be exposed to the work

Speaker:

of other agencies and other companies,

Speaker:

and I found there was a real,

Speaker:

not necessarily lacking of expertise,

Speaker:

but through my engineers background,

Speaker:

I was recognizing that the information being provided

Speaker:

isn't necessarily helpful,

Speaker:

so, I identified that I was doing better work

Speaker:

than many of the incumbents,

Speaker:

and thought, well, I think there's a gap

Speaker:

in the market for another company,

Speaker:

and that's when I took the step

Speaker:

and launched CANAXESS,

Speaker:

because I recognized,

Speaker:

while all of the incumbent's work

Speaker:

was very, very good,

Speaker:

I felt I could do it better,

Speaker:

and I could just use another angle,

Speaker:

so, ultimately, I feel accessibility

Speaker:

is that a technical discipline at times

Speaker:

where understanding how things work in HTML in code

Speaker:

within JavaScript can really affect the end user experience

Speaker:

if they're using assisted technology,

Speaker:

so, I guess my grounding

Speaker:

in software development made me appreciate more

Speaker:

that how things which are written

Speaker:

can vastly affect the end user's experience

Speaker:

if they're using assisted technology,

Speaker:

and through that, I launched my own company,

Speaker:

and it's been a wonderful journey.

Speaker:

I've met lots of interesting individuals,

Speaker:

worked with lots of different people,

Speaker:

and then recognize more

Speaker:

that the learning with accessibility never ends,

Speaker:

so, I always initially had this optimistic point

Speaker:

of, once I reached year X,

Speaker:

I would know about accessibility

Speaker:

and I'd be that knowledgeable individual,

Speaker:

but I found the more I learn

Speaker:

and the more I understand,

Speaker:

the more I feel that I don't know enough,

Speaker:

and that's driven me more and more,

Speaker:

and more to consume more blogs to reach out to more people,

Speaker:

and, overwhelmingly, just look past my own biases

Speaker:

of, I think this is absolutely right,

Speaker:

I would do it this way,

Speaker:

but to recognize more

Speaker:

that, with accessibility, it's the test,

Speaker:

the testing, again, testing it in multiple browsers,

Speaker:

in multiple assisted technology tools,

Speaker:

recognizing that just because something works

Speaker:

in one browser, in one screen reader,

Speaker:

that might not, necessarily,

Speaker:

be right for everyone's experience,

Speaker:

and I feel that, over time,

Speaker:

that uncertainty now has made me a bit more humble

Speaker:

with recognizing that my experience is just one voice.

Speaker:

It's recognizing many others have an equally valid voice,

Speaker:

and take all that on board as much as I can.

Speaker:

- Well, you've had a lot of experience

Speaker:

in working with government agencies,

Speaker:

so, you had all of those experiences,

Speaker:

and then you've had your experiences working

Speaker:

as a consultant.

Speaker:

As you kind of look at where accessibility is today,

Speaker:

is there one area where you think maybe

Speaker:

the accessibility community needs to put in more effort,

Speaker:

maybe an area that you think is particularly important

Speaker:

for us to be aware of looking forward?

Speaker:

Is there any certain place that maybe you're most excited

Speaker:

about developments that are coming along?

Speaker:

So, just if you have an idea

Speaker:

about maybe one of those future items.

Speaker:

- One of my major, major pet peeves,

Speaker:

and I found there's a real appetite

Speaker:

for understanding accessibility

Speaker:

in this area is with complex UI controls,

Speaker:

so, when you are making up a complex digital service,

Speaker:

there might be lots of interactivity there,

Speaker:

so, the teams would leverage the third party tools,

Speaker:

which have dialogue boxes, and dropdowns,

Speaker:

and auto suggest a control,

Speaker:

so, rather than a team having to build that,

Speaker:

they just use an existing component library.

Speaker:

Now these vendors may make bold accessibility claims

Speaker:

of, "We are 100% accessible to WCAG 2.2, 2.1,

Speaker:

we've got AA, we have VPAT,

Speaker:

we write about accessibility regularly,

Speaker:

and that often makes software teams building

Speaker:

a digital services complacent,

Speaker:

where, if a vendor has made these bold accessibility claims,

Speaker:

there's all this evidence indicating

Speaker:

that they value accessibility,

Speaker:

and they built it well,

Speaker:

and then these software teams adopt it,

Speaker:

because part of the procurement process

Speaker:

is making sure that the tool which you are using

Speaker:

is fit for a purpose,

Speaker:

but then, one of the most challenging times

Speaker:

was several years ago with a large government application

Speaker:

where they followed all of that material,

Speaker:

this accompanying out

Speaker:

a written blog post mentioning about accessibility,

Speaker:

and this team had readily adopted everything,

Speaker:

so, every single screen had UI controls from this vendor.

Speaker:

What we then found

Speaker:

is when we were auditing it towards the end,

Speaker:

just that final tick

Speaker:

of, is this application accessible

Speaker:

and ready for the general public?

Speaker:

What we noticed was every single workflow

Speaker:

was flawed where we had a testing

Speaker:

with people with vision impairments,

Speaker:

and they weren't able to get past the first screen,

Speaker:

and that was really disappointing,

Speaker:

because at that point the application had been written

Speaker:

and there was many, many months

Speaker:

and significant amounts of resources

Speaker:

would have to be dedicated to fix it,

Speaker:

so, in many ways,

Speaker:

that experience of my past has jaded me a little

Speaker:

with recognizing what a vendor says

Speaker:

isn't necessarily correct,

Speaker:

where I wouldn't say they're lying,

Speaker:

but there's being a little bit optimistic

Speaker:

with their claims

Speaker:

where we as accessibility individuals need

Speaker:

to treat cautiously any bold claim

Speaker:

of accessibility compliance

Speaker:

where we can recognize all of a vendor's efforts

Speaker:

with writing blog posts,

Speaker:

having a dedicated accessibility issue tracking,

Speaker:

and even making claims about it all look promising,

Speaker:

but unless we do our due diligence

Speaker:

of confirming that,

Speaker:

it's ultimately meaningless,

Speaker:

where, yes, we can tackle that information on board,

Speaker:

but, ultimately, we and other software teams,

Speaker:

and other individuals

Speaker:

who are commissioning large projects need

Speaker:

to really hold to account the companies

Speaker:

who have made bold claims about accessibility,

Speaker:

because often they might not be entirely accurate,

Speaker:

and, I guess, that us as a community as well,

Speaker:

it needs to move away at times of this...

Speaker:

How best can I say it?

Speaker:

It's recognizing that accessibility

Speaker:

is often with some voices treated

Speaker:

as a theoretical exercise

Speaker:

that the best approach is to use native HML elements

Speaker:

where they're possible, which is valid,

Speaker:

but then it's recognizing

Speaker:

that other teams also have as equal input,

Speaker:

so, we, I guess, need to do a better

Speaker:

where accessibility is vitally important

Speaker:

but as part of delivering a project

Speaker:

and the digital services,

Speaker:

we also need to recognize at times

Speaker:

that sometimes we need to make the compromises

Speaker:

where one approach is might be the best approach,

Speaker:

but we also need to understand

Speaker:

that sometimes that best approach isn't workable

Speaker:

and we might need to use the tool set

Speaker:

which is inaccessible,

Speaker:

so, rather than being that loud voice,

Speaker:

which is making dismissive remarks

Speaker:

about the accessory efforts of a vendor,

Speaker:

we need to say this is working,

Speaker:

but you could do this, this, and this,

Speaker:

so, I guess, us as an accessibility,

Speaker:

your community as a whole,

Speaker:

adopting an approach of humility more

Speaker:

where I don't necessarily think anyone

Speaker:

is going out of the way to deliberately make

Speaker:

a service inaccessible or poor for a blind user.

Speaker:

I think more it's the expectations

Speaker:

are much more increased now with the soccer teams.

Speaker:

There's less resourcing, and less time,

Speaker:

and so, often people make poor judgment calls,

Speaker:

which mean that the end user experience is effective,

Speaker:

so, overwhelmingly, it's recognizing

Speaker:

that it's not often a black and white approach.

Speaker:

It's recognizing those new nuances

Speaker:

and having to compromise,

Speaker:

and often lose the battle, but win a greater war,

Speaker:

so, if our aim is to make things accessible,

Speaker:

we often have to recognize

Speaker:

that we might have to allow compromises

Speaker:

with images which have poor descriptions or controls,

Speaker:

which have poor accessibility,

Speaker:

but if there's a roadmap of remedying it,

Speaker:

then that's a good compromise.

Speaker:

- Thanks for that case study example.

Speaker:

That was very helpful to get that

Speaker:

and to get your insights on that,

Speaker:

and I wanna thank you for participating in this, Ross.

Speaker:

I appreciate you taking the time

Speaker:

to be with me today,

Speaker:

and hopefully we can meet

Speaker:

in person sometime at a physical event,

Speaker:

maybe either on this side, or on your side,

Speaker:

but it was good to chat with you.

Speaker:

- I hope so too, Joe.

Speaker:

Thanks so much, and really good to talk

Speaker:

with another accessibility professional.

Speaker:

Thank you. - All right, thanks a lot.

Speaker:

Bye-bye.

About the Podcast

Show artwork for Digital Accessibility
Digital Accessibility
The People Behind the Progress

About your host

Profile picture for Joe Welinske

Joe Welinske

Serving as Accessibility Director at Blink is Joe's main activity. Blink is devoted to helping ensure that digital products and services can be used by everyone. As Director, Joe is responsible for helping Blink's practitioners to build accessibility into everything they do. He also evangelizes the need for accessibility with Blink's clients and partners.
Joe is a co-organizer of the Seattle Inclusive Design and Accessibility meetup group and he serves as the Secretary of the King County Metro Paratransit Advisory Committee.