Episode 2

Regulations Would Improve the Tools That We Use and Awareness

Ken Nakata, Converge Accessibility, Principal

Ken Nakata helps law firms and corporation understand web accessibility issues. His career began in the Department of Justice working on the original Americans with Disability Act legislation and litigation. When Section 508 appeared, Ken started working in that area and spent a long time in that digital accessibility effort.

Mentioned in this episode:

Info about Accessibility at Blink

Transcript
Speaker:

(upbeat orchestral music)

Speaker:

- Hello, this is Digital Accessibility,

Speaker:

The People Behind the Progress.

Speaker:

I'm Joe Wilinski, the creator and host of this series,

Speaker:

and as an accessibility professional myself,

Speaker:

I find it very interesting as to how others

Speaker:

have found their way into this profession.

Speaker:

So let's meet one of those people right now

Speaker:

and hear about their journey.

Speaker:

(uplifting music)

Speaker:

All right, well, here we go with another episode

Speaker:

where I have the opportunity to chat

Speaker:

with an accessibility practitioner,

Speaker:

and today I am speaking with Ken Nakata.

Speaker:

Hello, Ken, how are you today?

Speaker:

- Oh, pretty good.

Speaker:

It's an awesome day up here in Seattle.

Speaker:

- Well, I'm in the Seattle area as well, actually,

Speaker:

on Vashon Island,

Speaker:

which is near Blink's Seattle headquarters.

Speaker:

- Oh, okay, I'm over by the university

Speaker:

and Children's Hospital.

Speaker:

- All right, excellent.

Speaker:

Well, I've had the opportunity

Speaker:

to teach on that campus part-time for many years,

Speaker:

so it's always, but of course,

Speaker:

that hasn't happened for a while with the pandemic,

Speaker:

but hopefully we'll get back to that again in the future.

Speaker:

- Yeah, hopefully.

Speaker:

- It's good to have the opportunity to chat with you,

Speaker:

and, you know, a good place,

Speaker:

always a good place to start is

Speaker:

if you could just talk a little bit

Speaker:

about the work that you're doing now.

Speaker:

- Well, at this very moment,

Speaker:

I'm working on helping a county government

Speaker:

with their self-evaluation under Title II of the ADA,

Speaker:

but that's a little different from what I normally do.

Speaker:

Most of the time, on a typical day like today,

Speaker:

I would be working in web accessibility

Speaker:

and trying to help, typically a law firm,

Speaker:

understand web accessibility

Speaker:

when their client just suddenly got sued

Speaker:

for having an inaccessible website.

Speaker:

- And so is this

Speaker:

your personal business?

Speaker:

What are some of the things

Speaker:

that typically go on for you with one of your clients?

Speaker:

- Yeah, so my company is Converge Accessibility,

Speaker:

and we're about two years old.

Speaker:

We started right at the beginning of COVID,

Speaker:

and my business partner, Jeff Singleton and I,

Speaker:

have been doing this kind of work for the last however,

Speaker:

have been doing this kind of work for, gosh,

Speaker:

the last 15 years, I wanna say we've been working together.

Speaker:

And for that work,

Speaker:

we've mostly been doing web accessibility audits.

Speaker:

We've been also doing things like mobile app accessibility,

Speaker:

and sometimes we get into bigger-picture stuff.

Speaker:

Like, we've helped a number of companies

Speaker:

develop their global accessibility standards.

Speaker:

If they're, say, one of these big companies like an HP

Speaker:

or a Microsoft or a company like that,

Speaker:

that has a lot of product teams around the world,

Speaker:

we help them with their accessibility,

Speaker:

although now they pretty much have it all in house,

Speaker:

so they've got their processes pretty much locked down.

Speaker:

We sometimes just get involved

Speaker:

in some of these really bigger, more interesting projects

Speaker:

because we have a, well, I think one of the things

Speaker:

that makes us unique is that we have this perspective

Speaker:

that combines my background from working

Speaker:

at the Department of Justice,

Speaker:

and that work was doing lots of law and policy

Speaker:

together with my business partner

Speaker:

who comes from the more technical side

Speaker:

of working at Microsoft

Speaker:

and part of the accessible technology group there.

Speaker:

- Well, there's some things you mentioned

Speaker:

that I definitely wanna follow up with,

Speaker:

but right now I'd like to get into one of the things

Speaker:

that we always talk about in this program,

Speaker:

which is finding out how people ended up getting

Speaker:

to where they are today.

Speaker:

Accessibility, there's a lot of different paths

Speaker:

where people find their way into it.

Speaker:

So maybe reflect back on your own experiences

Speaker:

of work life or lived life.

Speaker:

Where did it start for you

Speaker:

where you start to think about accessibility

Speaker:

as something that was gonna be a big part of your life?

Speaker:

- Well, it's all just pure serendipity in my case.

Speaker:

So I don't have a disability,

Speaker:

and actually in my family,

Speaker:

no one in my family really has a disability.

Speaker:

So the way in which this got started,

Speaker:

and it's just the way in which my career developed,

Speaker:

I was working at a law firm in 1992,

Speaker:

and my friend says,

Speaker:

"You've always wanted to be a Civil Rights attorney, right?"

Speaker:

And I said, "Absolutely."

Speaker:

And he told me, "Well, the ADA recently got passed

Speaker:

and they are probably looking for attorneys down there."

Speaker:

And so I made some inquiries.

Speaker:

There was no job posting at the time,

Speaker:

and I just thought, okay, this is something I wanna do,

Speaker:

so I was very persistent

Speaker:

in applying for a position,

Speaker:

and sent constant writing samples,

Speaker:

that's one of the things you have to do

Speaker:

if you're an attorney, when you're applying for a job,

Speaker:

and made connections to people.

Speaker:

Well, I had some connections with people

Speaker:

in the Civil Rights division at the Justice Department,

Speaker:

and I ended up getting the job,

Speaker:

and I think I was maybe the third or fourth attorney

Speaker:

in the section, with this newly formed section,

Speaker:

that at that time was called

Speaker:

the Office on the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Speaker:

And we were actually a sub office within one of the sections

Speaker:

in the Justice Department

Speaker:

in a kind of lousy building in Washington, DC,

Speaker:

and we started there,

Speaker:

and back then we did everything.

Speaker:

We answered the phone lines, we did our investigations,

Speaker:

we did all the litigation, we answered the policy letters,

Speaker:

and we were coming up with, on a blank slate,

Speaker:

all the policies for the country

Speaker:

on the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Speaker:

And eventually that section grew

Speaker:

and became the Disability Rights Section,

Speaker:

and then, I think, now it's, what, 50, maybe 75 attorneys.

Speaker:

And it's obviously got a much bigger scope

Speaker:

in terms of what they have to do,

Speaker:

but it was really exciting back in those days,

Speaker:

basically doing everything.

Speaker:

So for the first half of my career,

Speaker:

I was pretty much like one of the other attorneys

Speaker:

and I did everything else,

Speaker:

the things that everybody else did.

Speaker:

After a few years, when Janet Reno came in,

Speaker:

she said, "Well, we don't want attorneys

Speaker:

answering the phone lines,"

Speaker:

so they got a whole bunch of people to do that,

Speaker:

and so I didn't have to do that,

Speaker:

although I kind of missed doing that.

Speaker:

And then during the second half of my career,

Speaker:

Section 508 of the Rehab Act was amended,

Speaker:

and that required that federal agencies had to make

Speaker:

their technology accessible, and so I jumped at that.

Speaker:

Nobody else wanted to do it

Speaker:

and I was really surprised by that,

Speaker:

but you gotta remember, attorneys are pretty much Luddites.

Speaker:

They don't wanna deal with technology, and so I did.

Speaker:

So I jumped at that and that led me to,

Speaker:

actually, yeah, that's the thing I'm most known for.

Speaker:

I had to do the surveys of the federal government,

Speaker:

so I was surveying all the different agencies

Speaker:

and the government about how they were managing

Speaker:

their technology to make sure it was accessible.

Speaker:

And I was leading this group

Speaker:

of agency coordinators

Speaker:

to try to develop best practices

Speaker:

and try to make sure

Speaker:

that the government's technology was accessible.

Speaker:

And then I was also doing the stuff

Speaker:

with trying to make the ADA policies aligned

Speaker:

with the concepts of web accessibility.

Speaker:

And then I left in 2004,

Speaker:

and I became a consultant after that,

Speaker:

and now I've just been mostly dealing with the stuff

Speaker:

with web accessibility and digital accessibility

Speaker:

that I had during the second half of my career,

Speaker:

but every now and then I get into one of these projects

Speaker:

where I do the stuff in my first half of my career,

Speaker:

like the stuff that I'm doing for self-evaluation

Speaker:

for a local government.

Speaker:

- Well, you covered a lot of things there.

Speaker:

Let me just go back a little bit

Speaker:

because I find it really interesting

Speaker:

just historically as well.

Speaker:

So when you first got involved with the ADA,

Speaker:

I mean, what was that like at the time?

Speaker:

It must have seemed like

Speaker:

there was just an enormous pool of things to look into.

Speaker:

Like, how did you prioritize what the activities were

Speaker:

that you would actually do in those early days?

Speaker:

- Yeah, so back then it was really complaint driven.

Speaker:

Under the ADA, an individual can file a private complaint

Speaker:

with the Department of Justice,

Speaker:

and we're supposed to go and look at it

Speaker:

and investigate it, you know.

Speaker:

And if there's discriminatory behavior by the respondent,

Speaker:

then we're supposed to take corrective action

Speaker:

and potentially litigate against them.

Speaker:

And it's really a matter back then

Speaker:

of responding to the complaints that are coming in.

Speaker:

And back then, I used to work on a lot of new construction

Speaker:

and alterations cases.

Speaker:

So that's something that we don't really get into

Speaker:

in the web accessibility world so much

Speaker:

because, well, there's no teeth to the requirements,

Speaker:

there's no teeth to the idea

Speaker:

that you have to build your website to WCAG 2.1 and AA.

Speaker:

Yes, that's what we tell people,

Speaker:

but it's not specifically spelled out in the regulations.

Speaker:

- It's different than building codes and things,

Speaker:

which traditionally have been

Speaker:

very much more prescriptive in the community.

Speaker:

- Oh yeah, exactly, yeah.

Speaker:

In the building, in the built environment,

Speaker:

yeah, there's a very strict requirement

Speaker:

that you have to comply

Speaker:

with the Justice Department's standards

Speaker:

on exactly what your building has to look like.

Speaker:

And those are really easy cases, I think,

Speaker:

because either, you know, either the,

Speaker:

the doorway is, what, 32 inches wide or it's not,

Speaker:

and if it isn't, then you get to sue about it.

Speaker:

And so it was pretty easy bringing those cases back then,

Speaker:

and we just got a lot of them,

Speaker:

and obviously, they were a high priority for us,

Speaker:

and I think that that was really important

Speaker:

because it created this awareness in the business community

Speaker:

that, "Oh my gosh, yeah,

Speaker:

we really have to make sure that our new buildings

Speaker:

and our alterations are accessible."

Speaker:

So I think that was definitely a high priority

Speaker:

in the very, very beginning, and then after that,

Speaker:

it moved into other things,

Speaker:

it moved into these more subtle forms of discrimination.

Speaker:

- And I think, generally, oh, sorry.

Speaker:

Yeah, I think, generally, then it kind of worked

Speaker:

because over time we did get, you know,

Speaker:

yeah, peers in the built out physical world

Speaker:

that standards are fairly well adhered to,

Speaker:

for the most part.

Speaker:

- For the most part, yeah.

Speaker:

There's still a surprising amount of construction out there

Speaker:

that is inaccessible,

Speaker:

but some of it is relatively minor violations

Speaker:

and some of them are not.

Speaker:

I was really surprised by some of the things I've seen

Speaker:

over the years.

Speaker:

- Well, then as you came into the Section 508 work,

Speaker:

I guess that was contemporaneous

Speaker:

with the work being done by the W3C,

Speaker:

with the WCAG guidelines and things

Speaker:

which helped to inform that,

Speaker:

but what was that activity like early on,

Speaker:

starting to formulate how to address digital accessibility?

Speaker:

- Oh, that was just like starting with the ADA.

Speaker:

It was writing on a whole new blank slate,

Speaker:

and it's something exciting about doing that.

Speaker:

There aren't that many opportunities

Speaker:

that that kind of time

Speaker:

just presents itself.

Speaker:

You know, like, when the ADA was passed

Speaker:

and people were struggling to figure things out,

Speaker:

yes, we had the regulations out there,

Speaker:

but there were so many things that were issues

Speaker:

that had to be considered and questions that came up,

Speaker:

and it was really exciting as an attorney

Speaker:

to be working in that early stages of things.

Speaker:

Once things have set,

Speaker:

they're a little bit more boring.

Speaker:

You just look up the answer and you make your argument,

Speaker:

but when it's all new and you're coming up with guidance,

Speaker:

you have to think about, well, gosh,

Speaker:

is that really the right thing to do?

Speaker:

Is that really too costly?

Speaker:

Is that really going to achieve the end result

Speaker:

that we want to achieve, which is trying to lower barriers

Speaker:

or eliminate barriers for people with disabilities?

Speaker:

And so there's a lot of thought

Speaker:

that goes into that kind of balance, and that's fun.

Speaker:

And so it was fun during the beginning of the ADA

Speaker:

and it was fun during the beginning of 508, too.

Speaker:

- Well, I think you mentioned that the Section 508 work

Speaker:

was subject to more interpretation maybe

Speaker:

than some of the legal requirements

Speaker:

about the physical world.

Speaker:

How did you approach those gray areas?

Speaker:

What were the places where you identified

Speaker:

that it was important to get involved,

Speaker:

and then how did that kind of move into a legal framework?

Speaker:

- Yeah, well, being a lawyer that knows,

Speaker:

with a fair understanding of technology,

Speaker:

does make this a lot easier.

Speaker:

So I think of it as web accessibility

Speaker:

ultimately comes down to a very simple ADA requirement,

Speaker:

which is effective communication,

Speaker:

and so the question then becomes, well, what does that mean?

Speaker:

So in the ADA, well, we have certain ways in which,

Speaker:

the technical assistance manuals

Speaker:

that accompany the ADA regulations that were developed

Speaker:

by the Justice Department,

Speaker:

they give examples of things

Speaker:

that public entities and places of public accommodation

Speaker:

have to do in order to make sure

Speaker:

that their information is accessible.

Speaker:

So they have to provide sign language interpreters,

Speaker:

they have to provide CART

Speaker:

if they're doing, say, a public event,

Speaker:

they have to make sure

Speaker:

that written communications are accessible

Speaker:

by providing them in alternate formats.

Speaker:

And so when we think about web accessibility,

Speaker:

well, what does that look like?

Speaker:

And really,

Speaker:

because a webpage

Speaker:

is not a one-on-one kind of communication,

Speaker:

we need to have a universal design standard

Speaker:

for web accessibility that we can say

Speaker:

these are the things you should design your website to,

Speaker:

and conveniently, that happens to be WCAG.

Speaker:

So we've got something that we can point to,

Speaker:

and we've got a legal basis for saying it.

Speaker:

We use the effective communication requirement to get there.

Speaker:

And the way in which I've always said it is

Speaker:

that WCAG is really a safe harbor right now

Speaker:

because there's no regulation that says you have to do it.

Speaker:

You have to just provide effective communication.

Speaker:

But if every settlement agreement out there

Speaker:

that's issued by the Justice Department that uses web,

Speaker:

that involves web accessibility,

Speaker:

always uses the WCAG standards as the standard

Speaker:

that they're building to,

Speaker:

and so if you are a web developer

Speaker:

and you build to that,

Speaker:

the Justice Department doesn't go higher than that,

Speaker:

so it's effectively a safe harbor.

Speaker:

- Well, then exploring that maybe a little bit more,

Speaker:

if we could, when you're talking about it

Speaker:

as a safe harbor with your clients,

Speaker:

how does that manifest itself

Speaker:

in terms of their strategy?

Speaker:

Is it that they do things

Speaker:

in a certain way that will, essentially,

Speaker:

put them in that safe harbor?

Speaker:

I'm assuming that a lot of the people that you work with

Speaker:

don't really have an understanding,

Speaker:

at least early on, of the technical underpinnings,

Speaker:

and so how do they start to identify

Speaker:

that they're starting to be in that safe place legally?

Speaker:

- Oh yeah, so,

Speaker:

well, I think that the way

Speaker:

in which most consultants do this,

Speaker:

most of the consultants that are in my space,

Speaker:

we pretty much all follow the same basic methodology.

Speaker:

It all comes down to trying to,

Speaker:

we examine the website,

Speaker:

and we usually have a client walk us through their website,

Speaker:

and the goal there is to try to find the type of content

Speaker:

that they're typically putting up on a webpage,

Speaker:

'cause on a website, people tend not to experiment that much

Speaker:

and just say, "Oh, I'm putting up a new webpage today.

Speaker:

I think I'm gonna come up with some brand new content

Speaker:

I've never placed on this webpage before.

Speaker:

I'm gonna put up a new type of control,

Speaker:

or I'm gonna put up a calendar date picker,

Speaker:

or I'm gonna pick up a three-state checkbox

Speaker:

because I can."

Speaker:

People tend not to do that.

Speaker:

People tend to use the same design motifs

Speaker:

that they've always used.

Speaker:

They tend to use, if I've used the tab control

Speaker:

for displaying tabs and content and tabs,

Speaker:

I'm probably gonna do that not just on one page.

Speaker:

I'm probably gonna do it on a bunch of pages

Speaker:

because it's just something that I'm used to

Speaker:

and people are used to that,

Speaker:

my visitors are used to seeing that.

Speaker:

Or if I'm putting it on videos,

Speaker:

I'm probably gonna make my videos

Speaker:

probably pretty much looked the same,

Speaker:

and so it's not that hard

Speaker:

to try to get representative samples of the type

Speaker:

of content that people typically put up on their page.

Speaker:

And so you can take a site that's quite complex

Speaker:

and really boil it down

Speaker:

to just a couple of different pages

Speaker:

that includes that type of content,

Speaker:

and that also includes the templated content,

Speaker:

like the headers and the footers, and the navigation panes,

Speaker:

and things like that.

Speaker:

And so that's basically what all of us consultants do.

Speaker:

We try to take this e-commerce site, for instance,

Speaker:

with tens of thousands of products and different pages

Speaker:

and boil it down to about 25, maybe 30, maybe 50,

Speaker:

if you're looking at the backend consumer,

Speaker:

the login process for managing their accounts,

Speaker:

if you get into that, yeah, then it's a bunch more pages,

Speaker:

but it really brings a site down

Speaker:

to a very finite number of pages.

Speaker:

Okay, once you identify the accessibility patterns

Speaker:

that are problematic on that limited set,

Speaker:

then the client can go and replicate that

Speaker:

throughout the rest of their site,

Speaker:

and so that makes it relatively easy.

Speaker:

And for the time being, in a short term,

Speaker:

that's really great because, well,

Speaker:

as they're building out new content,

Speaker:

chances are they're gonna still be using

Speaker:

that same old designs,

Speaker:

and so you can actually get a lot of traction,

Speaker:

you can get a lot of mileage, not traction.

Speaker:

You can get a lot of mileage out of that approach,

Speaker:

and then you combine that with, you know,

Speaker:

some automated testing,

Speaker:

and maybe a periodic accessibility review,

Speaker:

and yeah, you're pretty good.

Speaker:

So until the next major design refresh comes along

Speaker:

where all of a sudden

Speaker:

you're starting from zero, essentially,

Speaker:

when you bring out all new wire frames

Speaker:

and just completely change the site, until that happens,

Speaker:

you're pretty good for accessibility.

Speaker:

So as long as you just keep doing that.

Speaker:

So I think that that's really what,

Speaker:

I think that's the way in which

Speaker:

most of our clients approach it,

Speaker:

and I think that that's the way, yeah,

Speaker:

I think, in general, most people approach it

Speaker:

if they wanna be thorough about it.

Speaker:

- Do you get questions about,

Speaker:

quote, unquote, "Certification?"

Speaker:

I know I run into that a lot with organizations

Speaker:

that aren't familiar with accessibility.

Speaker:

They're kind of looking for something

Speaker:

that maybe is the equivalent of a building code

Speaker:

in the physical world,

Speaker:

which applies some official

Speaker:

stamp of approval.

Speaker:

We don't really have that in the digital space.

Speaker:

How do you handle those types of conversations

Speaker:

and express the way for them to show

Speaker:

that they're doing things in the right way?

Speaker:

- Well, all lawyers are trained

Speaker:

in how to avoid answers.

Speaker:

No, okay, seriously though,

Speaker:

the way in which I answer that is

Speaker:

by just pointing to the W3C site itself and saying,

Speaker:

there's a, I forgot what page it's at,

Speaker:

but basically, in order to say

Speaker:

that you are WCAG 2.0 or 2.1 A or AA compliant,

Speaker:

you have to meet all of the requirements

Speaker:

on all of your pages on a site,

Speaker:

and on a typical client site that has thousands of pages,

Speaker:

there's practically no way that anybody can say that.

Speaker:

And I think that that's one of the major impetuses

Speaker:

for, so-called, Silver, WCAG 3.0,

Speaker:

is to come up with a more realistic, I suppose,

Speaker:

certification, or not certification,

Speaker:

a grading process for whether you're compliant

Speaker:

or you're not compliant.

Speaker:

I don't know whether I agree with that effort,

Speaker:

but it is that really high bar that the W3C set

Speaker:

in terms of every page has to fully comply

Speaker:

with the standards, basically makes it impossible

Speaker:

for anybody to say that they fully comply with the standards

Speaker:

and that they meet that bar

Speaker:

'cause websites are always changing.

Speaker:

So that's what I tell them.

Speaker:

- Well, maybe if we could move

Speaker:

into kind of more free thinking

Speaker:

about the past and future.

Speaker:

You've been involved in this for a long time,

Speaker:

kind of looking back on how things have evolved,

Speaker:

do you have any thoughts about areas

Speaker:

that you think, where, like, you're surprised

Speaker:

that things have moved in a positive way

Speaker:

as well as they have?

Speaker:

And then the other side of it,

Speaker:

are there some areas

Speaker:

where you still see significant challenges

Speaker:

for bringing accessibility into the world?

Speaker:

- Well, you know, it's no secret

Speaker:

that I've been frustrated by the fact

Speaker:

that the Justice Department, my old office,

Speaker:

hasn't issued a update to the Title III

Speaker:

and Title II regulations for web accessibility.

Speaker:

I think that that would go really long way

Speaker:

to improving awareness, I think,

Speaker:

and I think that if every business out there had something

Speaker:

that they could definitely point to,

Speaker:

then all the content management providers,

Speaker:

the WordPresses of the world,

Speaker:

or in the case of state and local government,

Speaker:

CivicPluses of the world

Speaker:

would have a much stronger incentive to make sure

Speaker:

that they make it really easy

Speaker:

to make really compliant webpages.

Speaker:

So I think that the regulations would improve the tools

Speaker:

that we use, it would improve the awareness,

Speaker:

it would just make things just generally better.

Speaker:

In the short term, it may increase the number of lawsuits,

Speaker:

but I guess they could take care of that

Speaker:

by building in a phase-in period.

Speaker:

But for the fact that it's 20 years later

Speaker:

and we're still talking about,

Speaker:

20 years since I left,

Speaker:

almost 20 years since I left the Justice Department

Speaker:

and came up with the basic technical guidance

Speaker:

for state and local governments,

Speaker:

the fact that now they just issued new guidance

Speaker:

that says exactly the same thing,

Speaker:

so it says to me

Speaker:

that really they haven't gotten anywhere on this.

Speaker:

And then there's the explosion of lawsuits,

Speaker:

which are just being fueled by the inaction

Speaker:

and the vagueness of what Title III entities have to do,

Speaker:

so that's the big one.

Speaker:

I think another thing,

Speaker:

another opportunity that's coming up is

Speaker:

that our society really hasn't still

Speaker:

gotten to the point that the worlds of digital accessibility

Speaker:

and the worlds of physical accessibility,

Speaker:

built environment accessibility, have merged, so to speak.

Speaker:

Yeah, you go to these conferences

Speaker:

on digital accessibility, like CSUN

Speaker:

or Accessing Higher Ground,

Speaker:

and you only hear barely mention a physical accessibility

Speaker:

or traditional accessibility.

Speaker:

You go to the ADA Symposium

Speaker:

or any other traditional,

Speaker:

built environment type of conference,

Speaker:

and you mention web and digital accessibility,

Speaker:

and generally people's eyes glaze over

Speaker:

and they have no idea what you're talking about,

Speaker:

and that's unfortunate

Speaker:

because there's a much stronger framework

Speaker:

in terms of accomplishing things in that built environment,

Speaker:

and if they were to merge, then I think

Speaker:

that we'd end up having a lot better compliance.

Speaker:

Like, for instance, state and local governments

Speaker:

have to have a Title II coordinator who's responsible

Speaker:

for everything that that agency is doing

Speaker:

in terms of accessibility.

Speaker:

It's kind of like the one-stop shop for accessibility,

Speaker:

and that person is also responsible

Speaker:

for overseeing the planning for accessibility,

Speaker:

and usually that doesn't include the website

Speaker:

or the digital communications, and that's really too bad

Speaker:

because if they were,

Speaker:

then they'd get extra budget for that

Speaker:

and they could plan much more intelligently for that.

Speaker:

And the fact that, as a consultant,

Speaker:

I see a lot of RFPs that come out

Speaker:

from state and local governments,

Speaker:

and they come across my desk every day,

Speaker:

and I can't tell you how many RFPs I see

Speaker:

for website redesigns

Speaker:

that either don't mention accessibility,

Speaker:

or if they do mention accessibility,

Speaker:

just have it as one little check off item

Speaker:

on a list of 30 other items, that says,

Speaker:

"Oh yeah, and by the way,

Speaker:

yeah, our website fully complies

Speaker:

with all these security requirements,

Speaker:

our website complies with all these privacy requirements.

Speaker:

We are not exporting technologies

Speaker:

outside of territorial boundaries of the United States,"

Speaker:

blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,

Speaker:

we don't beat up on puppies and little children,

Speaker:

and, by the way, we fully meet WCAG 2.0,

Speaker:

and of course, a vendor is just gonna be, check.

Speaker:

He's just gonna be, like, barely paying attention

Speaker:

to the requirements and checking things off,

Speaker:

and so we all know what happens,

Speaker:

of course end up an inaccessible website.

Speaker:

- Well, I really appreciate those insights

Speaker:

that you just provided

Speaker:

as a look to the future,

Speaker:

and it was also really interesting to me

Speaker:

to learn about how some of the things move forward

Speaker:

in the Justice Department.

Speaker:

So thanks so much for taking the time

Speaker:

to share your knowledge and expertise with us.

Speaker:

- Yeah, thanks, and also,

Speaker:

one little thing I forgot to mention is,

Speaker:

supposedly, the Justice Department is coming up

Speaker:

with regulations next year on Title II

Speaker:

and web accessibility.

Speaker:

So when they do, definitely seek those,

Speaker:

seek that draft regulation out

Speaker:

because anybody can comment on a regulation

Speaker:

no matter who they are.

Speaker:

You don't have to be a person who's directly affected

Speaker:

by a regulation, and they wanna hear from you,

Speaker:

so they'll be hearing from me.

Speaker:

- That's a really good point as well.

Speaker:

So look for that sometime next year.

Speaker:

Well, thanks again, Ken,

Speaker:

and hopefully we can meet up

Speaker:

at one of those events that you'd mentioned

Speaker:

in a physical sense sometime.

Speaker:

- Yeah, hopefully, once COVID's over.

Speaker:

- All right, thanks a lot, bye bye.

About the Podcast

Show artwork for Digital Accessibility
Digital Accessibility
The People Behind the Progress

About your host

Profile picture for Joe Welinske

Joe Welinske

Serving as Accessibility Director at Blink is Joe's main activity. Blink is devoted to helping ensure that digital products and services can be used by everyone. As Director, Joe is responsible for helping Blink's practitioners to build accessibility into everything they do. He also evangelizes the need for accessibility with Blink's clients and partners.
Joe is a co-organizer of the Seattle Inclusive Design and Accessibility meetup group and he serves as the Secretary of the King County Metro Paratransit Advisory Committee.